|
Buoyant blog of septuagenarian Kanadian poet and lifelong haikuist Chris Faiers/cricket. Poetry, esp. People's Poetry in the tradition of Milton Acorn, haiku/haibun, progressive politikal rants, engaged Buddhism and meditation, updates on the revitalizing of Callaghan's Rapids Conservation Area, memories of ZenRiver Gardens retreat near Marmora and annual Purdy Country LitFests (PurdyFests), events literary and politikal, and pics, amid swirling currents of earth magick and shamanism.
|
|
from World BEYOND War
By Marc Eliot Stein, World BEYOND War, October 28, 2024
“Out demons out!” On October 21, 1967, poet, activist, singer and DIY publisher Ed Sanders led an exorcism of the Pentagon in USA’s capital city to protest the disaster in Vietnam. Purely by coincidence, or perhaps due to the contrivance of mysterious spirits, we were honored to be joined by Ed Sanders from his home in Woodstock for a conversation on the World BEYOND War podcast on the same morning 57 years later.
How much has changed between 1967 and 2024? We talked about nuclear madness and humanity’s self-destructive nihilism, Sanders’s youthful protests and arrest for attacking a nuclear submarine, Herman Kahn’s depressing 1960 book “On Thermonuclear War” and how President Lyndon B. Johnson’s hopes for a progressive presidency were destroyed by war. We talked about the deep state, the absurdities of USA’s looming Harris vs. Trump election, Africom, Chernobyl, Elon Musk, the current disasters in Ukraine and Gaza. “It all leads in one direction: World War Three”.
Ed Sanders is a hero and inspiration to me and many others for his joyful and eclectic spirit of protest, and for his brilliant early innovations as a do-it-yourself publisher who used a mimeograph machine to self-produce a groundbreaking poetry journal that could not be censored and ended up publishing some of the best poets of the 1960s. “When in doubt, publish!” Sanders says. He found his first mimeograph machine while volunteering at Dorothy Day’s Catholic Worker in New York City, and tells the story of how he eventually made up with Dorothy Day for once using her machine without permission.
A lot of today’s interview is about other great pacifist souls like Dorothy Day who influenced and inspired Ed Sanders (and, still, many of us today): Allen Ginsberg, Bradford Lyttle, Phil Ochs, Pete Seeger, Abbie Hoffman, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Gregory Corso and Judith Malina.
For me as a podcast host and member of the confused generation that came after the hippie era, it was an absolute thrill to talk to a cultural figure who inspired me tremendously in my own formative years. The most moving parts of this interview for me were when we talked about the need for humor, balance and moderation in a lifetime of furious protest.
As our conversation ranged from William F. Buckley to Jack Kerouac to Caryl Chessman to Muammar Gaddafi to Vladimir Putin, I only regret that we forgot to shout out Sanders’s fellow Fug Tuli Kupferberg, even though the episode begins with the 1968 song “Dover Beach” by the Fugs, featuring the final verse of Matthew Arnold’s poem. The episode ends with a recording of the 1967 exorcism and attempted levitation of USA’s military headquarters from the Fugs album “Tenderness Junction”. Thanks to Ed Sanders for talking to us on the World BEYOND War podcast!
The World BEYOND War Podcast page is here. All episodes are free and permanently available. Please subscribe and give us a good rating at any of the services below:
World BEYOND War Podcast on iTunes
World BEYOND War Podcast on Spotify
World BEYOND War Podcast RSS Feed
from EDSITEment
by Joe Phelan
2015
My apologies if I'm breaking any copyrights by posting from EDSITEment. This article just seems such a timely and appropriate analysis of the causes and dangers of the Trump election.
In 1831, an ambitious and unusually perceptive twenty-five-year-old French aristocrat, Alexis de Tocqueville, visited the United States. His nine-month sojourn led to the writing of Democracy in America, universally regarded as one of the most influential books ever written.
The book is influential both for its study of American society in the Jacksonian period and for its analysis of democracy. In his introduction, Tocqueville writes: “In America, I saw more than America… I sought the image of democracy itself, with its inclinations, its character, its prejudices, and its passions. I wanted to know democracy, if only to know at least what we must hope or fear from it.”
A complex informational text such as this poses an invigorating challenge to high school students. With this challenge in mind, we have developed a new unit that focuses on one of the most famous and controversial of Tocqueville’s arguments.
Equipped with a deep understanding of the achievements and failures of European civilization and an equally deep passion for liberty and human dignity, Tocqueville was able to bring his complex perspective to bear on his subject. In America, he saw and praised a people who enjoyed an unprecedented equality of conditions and political and civil liberty without endangering order or prosperity. But he also saw and criticized the way white majorities supported the institution of slavery and the unjust treatment of free blacks and Native Americans. In fact, the greatest danger Americans faced was inherent in their treatment of unpopular minorities.
From the founding period to the time of his visit, Americans had become increasingly more egalitarian and democratic. The notion that the people can do no wrong became widely held. Tocqueville, in the light of his “new political science,” calls this an “impious and detestable maxim.” In Volume 2, Part 2, Chapter 7, “Of the Omnipotence of the Majority in the United States and Its Effects,” he lays out his argument against this view.
The power of the democratic majority arises from the fact that every individual is assumed to be competent to guide his own life and is politically the equal of every other individual. In this situation, the greatest legitimate power will always be with the majority.
In Europe, with its complex hierarchical societies, the majority has little or no power. It is rather the aristocracy, the clergy, the legal profession, and the rising merchant class—the independent centers of powers—that will resist and even oppose the sovereign. Some of these groups do exist in democracies, but they have little or no independent legitimacy.
According to Tocqueville, these “intermediary” institutions that exist in aristocracies serve as a “dike” against the force of dominant political power and a vital protection for human dignity and liberty. Because American democracy lacks such intermediary institutions, it has “no lasting obstacles” in the way of the opinions, prejudices, interests, and momentary passions of the majority and tends towards an unthinking despotism over unpopular minorities.
Tocqueville does not mean that the majority in a democracy will always act tyrannically, only that nothing can prevent it from so doing. He further argues that tendency to acquiesce in the rightness of majority opinion has negative long-term consequences on national character and culture.
Is trumpism the final stage in the decline of the amerikan empire? Remember that hitler was also first elected.
|
|