Total Pageviews

Saturday, 13 June 2026

Ways Forward from this Polycrisis: David Suzuki/Ian Hanington

 To view this email as a web page, click here


A protected area sign

Connected crises contain opportunities

 for a better world

The climate crisis is not simply an isolated technological challenge. It’s part

 of a much larger “polycrisis.” After all, everything is interconnected.


The magnitude of this “system disequilibrium,” as Canadian author, social

 scientist and Cascade Institute executive director Thomas Homer-Dixon

 calls it, can cause a sense of hopelessness, but it is resolvable —

 with major changes in the ways we conduct ourselves on this small planet.


That’s the message of a comprehensive new study. The World

 Inequality Lab’s “Global Justice Report: A Plan for Equality &

 Prosperity Within Planetary Boundaries” — by 45 authors using

 databases compiled by more than 200 researchers from around

 the world — states that “it is possible to reconcile planetary

 habitability and high well-being for all, but only if the transformation

 rests on three pillars simultaneously.”

This will require significantly altering the power structures

 that now govern our world and that are driving us toward calamity.

The pillars are rapid decarbonization of energy systems, a shift from

 overconsumption toward “sufficiency” (including reduced labour hours

 and raw materials use and large changes in food habits, land use and

 forest cover) and a “drastic reduction in inequality of income, wealth

 and power” between and within countries.


This will require significantly altering the power structures that now govern

 our world and that are driving us toward calamity. It would include “hefty

 wealth taxes on billionaires, sharp reductions in working hours, a change

 in diets and a shift of investment from materially intense sectors, such

 as industry and mining, to education and health,” the Guardian reports.


The majority of humans would benefit, as it would double the incomes

 of 89 per cent of the world’s population by 2100 and keep global heating

 below 2 C above the preindustrial average. It would also reduce the

 average workweek to about 2.5 days, increasing leisure time.


Wealth inequality would be sharply reduced, with the poorest half of

 humanity increasing its portion from two to 30 per cent, while the

 billionaire class would see its share fall from six to 0.05 per cent.


“Close to 90% of the world’s population would double their income

 between 2026 and 2100, and once leisure and a habitable planet

 are counted, more than 99% come out ahead,” WIL co-director and

 Paris School of Economics professor Thomas Piketty and others wrote in a Guardian article.

As people feel less economically secure, they support authoritarian leaders, but that then leads to a backlash against green policies, undermining efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption.

Piketty says the ideology of people currently in power or rising in the

 United States and many other countries can’t deliver what most of humanity needs.


“At the end of the day we’ll have to come to this kind of cooperative

 redistribution of resources and power because the alternative will

 simply lead to disastrous outcomes both on the environment, on the

 climate, but also on social grounds,” he told the Guardian.


Homer-Dixon argues that, although the interrelated crises may

 seem dire, they also present opportunities. That requires

 understanding how they connect, and how feedback loops

 exacerbate the problems. For example, fossil fuel consumption

 leads to climate change, which produces economic costs. “As

 people feel less economically secure, they support authoritarian

 leaders, but that then leads to a backlash against green

 policies, undermining efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption.”


The opportunity, he says, is that this “delegitimizes the existing way

 of doing stuff, the existing vested-interest stakeholders who are hunkered

 down and don’t want anything to change.”

What stands in the way is not technical impossibility but political choice and the hard but crucial work of building a coalition behind it.

The Cascade Institute and the WIL report attempt to understand the holistic

 nature of the polycrisis to find solutions. Given that one underlying cause

 is wealth hoarding and inequality, the backlash from the ultra-wealthy and

 their political backers will likely heat up. The “Global Justice Report” notes

 that average per capita gross national income worldwide would increase

 for almost everyone but, “The exception would be the mega-rich, who

 would be highly taxed because they are most responsible for the climate crisis.”


As well as taxing the overly affluent, the report recommends measures such

 as “a global justice fund to finance the energy transition and oversee an

 increase in education and healthcare spending” and “a world sovereign

 fund, which would rebalance global holdings of public and private wealth closer

 to proportions last seen in 1970.”


It concludes that a better, more equal world is materially possible. “What stands

 in the way is not technical impossibility but political choice and the hard but

 crucial work of building a coalition behind it.”

It’s a coalition we should all get behind.

By David Suzuki, with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor and Writer Ian Hanington

Share on Facebook
 
Share on Bluesky

Support the David Suzuki Foundation

Your gift will help push for bold climate action, protect nature so it can sustain all life and create resilient communities that benefit everyone.

 

Thursday, 11 June 2026

Doe and fawn playing in an alvar: Doug's wildlife photography

Doug caught this mother and fawn whitetail deer playing in an alvar at Callaghan's Rapids Conservation Area using a trail camera.




they gambol






she sees the camera and junior performs


What the heck's an Alvar?

 Alvar


Almost all of North America’s alvars

are found within the Great Lakes

basin. There are several types of

alvar, most of which are globally

imperiled and under stress.


Alvar Pavement and Grassland

 Less than 10% tree cover and less

than 25% shrub cover

 High abundance of herbaceous

plants or exposed bedrock (may be

covered with lichens and mosses)


Alvar Shrubland

 Less than 10% tree cover with

moderate to high cover of shrubs

 Variable amounts of herbaceous,

moss, and lichen cover


Alvar Woodland and Savanna

 Partial canopy of trees;

savannas: 10 - 25% cover and

woodlands: 25 - 60%

 High cover of shrubs, with some

trees, and some herbaceous, moss

and lichen cover


 

Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Our Major Press Ignores Amerikan Threats: Charlie Angus