Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Canuck Cong!? prepping for Yankee invasion: Charlie Angus/The Resistance

 

Canada Prepares for the What-if Moment

As I write this, Canadian military planners are working on scenarios to deal with an invasion from the United States. This is no drill, and time in the short term is not on our side. We must be prepared. The threat to Canada is coming, and it is serious. Canada must move quickly and with determination.

According to a report in the Globe and Mail, Canada’s military is planning for the possibility of a North American war.

This isn’t going to be like a European ground war. Instead, the Canadian forces will utilize the immense experience they received in the counter-insurgency war in Afghanistan. Except in this case, the Canadians are preparing to fight like the Mujahadeen.

Canadian military scenarios assume the American army could occupy key Canadian points within the first week. Rather than try to stop the Americans at the border, Canadian troops would pull back in order to focus on counter-insurgency efforts. The objective is to create “mass casualties.”

The Canadian military is gaming out strategies studied by Canadian counter-insurgency expert Dr. Aisha Ahmad. Like the military brass, she expects that if the Americans come over the border, they would launch a quick assault on key positions.

According to Dr. Ahmad, that is “not be the end of the story. It’s just the beginning.”

Writing in The Conversation, she points out that people mistake Canadian niceness for meekness. This would not be the case if the Americans invaded Canada.

“Except for a few collaborators, my research suggests many Canadians would likely engage in various forms of everyday resistance against invading forces that could involve stealing, lying, cutting wires, and diverting funds.

She predicts that Canadian resistance would take the fight to the United States.

“The Canada-U.S. border is also easy to cross, which would give insurgents access to American critical infrastructure. It costs tens of billions of dollars to build an energy pipeline, and only a few thousand to blow one up.”

“But in this nightmare scenario, could Canadians successfully resist an American invasion? Absolutely…. a military invasion of Canada would trigger a decades-long violent resistance, which would ultimately destroy the United States.”

She writes that if only one percent of Canada’s population stepped up to resist, that would represent 400,000 insurgents, ten times the number of Taliban fighters.

Americans suck at counterinsurgency; Canadians would be on their home ground.

Trump is delusional if he believes that 40 million Canadians will passively accept conquest.”

And here’s where the seriousness of this issue comes home.

The federal government has announced plans to create a 300,000-person volunteer force of ordinary citizens. The Globe and Mail states that the number is actually 400,000. That’s the same number Dr. Ahmad identified as being ideal for destroying the American forces.

I hate writing this. I hate imagining it. But I hate the threats posed against democracy even more. We need to be realistic.

The American empire is disintegrating before our eyes. Trump’s threats to attack an independent, peaceful nation have escalated. He claims that he is attacking Greenland because he was rebuffed by the Nobel Prize committee.

Such an admission should have immediately caused the American power establishment to step in and find ways to remove him from power. They haven’t. Meanwhile, the rhetoric against our nation is increasing.

Steve Bannon says Canada is becoming “hostile” to the United States.

The Prime Minister and General Carignan must move quickly on reaching out to Canadians about the volunteer force. It may be the one thing that gets the Americans’ attention and makes them think we are serious, and they may think twice.

This is not a drill. Time is not on our side in the short term. But our nation is unified more than at any time in memory.

The Americans will think twice if they know that we are willing to stand up to them.

We’ve got this.


Charlie Angus / The Resistance is a reader-supported publication - please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Thank you.

This post is public — feel free to share it.

Share

Thank you for reading Charlie Angus / The Resistance. If you’d like to upgrade to a paid subscription your support will help keep this project independent and sustainable. I’m grateful to have you here - thank you for your support.

Tuesday, 20 January 2026

MAGA = Make Amerika Go Away" : Avaaz petition supporting Greenland (please sign)

 


Saturday, 17 January 2026

Nobel Gong Show: Charlie Angus/The Resistance

 

Degrading the Nobel Prize

Hey there fellow resisters — does anyone know where I can pick up a used Nobel? I’m asking for a friend.

I would never make such a request for an important prize like the Stanley Cup or any of the Conference league trophies. Those awards are so hallowed that players wouldn’t even dare touch them without having earned the right, lest they jinx their own careers forever.

Not so with the Nobel Prize.

Donald Trump has been publicly demanding a Nobel Peace Prize since his return to office. Most people thought of it as just another example of the narcissistic stunts of the American Caligula.

But then Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Machado gave him hers.

She offered up the award in hopes that he would recognize her as the rightful leader of the country he had just taken over.

Venezuelan opposition leader Machado 'grateful' to Trump after giving him  her Nobel medal - ABC News

One thing about Trump is that he detests weakness, and Machado left the White House in humiliation. Trump opted to stick with Maduro’s regime (minus the figurehead).

Machado’s craven display raises a deeper question: why she was awarded the prize in the first place?

She’s been promoted by the West as a valiant democrat, a fighter for freedom. But was she really the person who deserved to walk in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, and Malala Yousafzai?

She has openly cheered on the strongman antics of Donald Trump and the genocidal government of Benjamin Netanyahu. That alone should give pause.

The decision to award the prize to a relatively unknown Venezuelan politician built the narrative of the people versus the dictator. But now that we’re getting to know more about her, the question must be asked did Norway use the prize to appease the political agenda of the United States?

The committee is made up of five retired members of the Norwegian parliament. The awarding of the prize has come under much criticism over the years because it is said that Norway uses it as an instrument for nation-building and furthering the country’s foreign policy and economic interests.

In 2011, Michael Nobel, a grandson of the Nobel family, accused the committee of politicizing the award in contravention of the original vision.

There have been many misfires with this approach. Mahatma Gandhi never won the award. Neither did Cory Aquino or Václav Havel. Henry Kissinger did. So did Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama.

In the case of Machado, was Norway hoping to appease the White House, who were actively undermining the government of Nicolás Maduro?

Her willingness to use the prize as a bargaining chip cheapens the entire meaning of the award. The committee should consider recalling the prize.

I doubt that will happen.

Instead, one can expect the Nobel committee to become the latest esteemed institution to fall to what John R. Harris describes as the “great grovel” in the age of Trump.

But if the prize does show up on eBay, let me know. It would look great in my rec room.


Charlie Angus / The Resistance is a reader-supported publication - please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Thank you.

This post is public — feel free to share it.

Share

Thank you for reading Charlie Angus / The Resistance. If you’d like to upgrade to a paid subscription your support will help keep this project independent and sustainable. I’m grateful to have you here - thank you for your support.

Thursday, 15 January 2026

Banished Poets Society looking for poems for Feb. issue/Katherine L. Gordon

 Hello all, I am collecting poems now for the next print issue of the BPS which I hope to produce in February.  Please post requests for submissions.  We need poems to reinforce our democracy and equality, our environmental care, while still keeping the beauty of poetry, our joined voices to overcome tyrants and oppression, all the societal pressures that oppress people.  We can make a difference.

I will of course forward to my M.P.   The U.S. is waking up and we know we can have an impact.  We have several new members who have just subscribed and you will see their work in the Feb. Issue.

Poetry peace and power as Chris would say,

love and light from Katherine.


klgordon@gmail.com

Monday, 12 January 2026

The Arrest of Mark Carney will bring Peace and Prosperity (satire from Halifax Examiner and The Tyee): Tim Bousquet

 

[Editor’s note: This satirical opinion piece was originally published in the Halifax Examiner. Editor Tim Bousquet was prompted by the Washington Post editorial board’s apology for President Donald Trump’s kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, ‘to the point that I could lift entire paragraphs and just change a few words.’]

August 5, 2026
Washington Post
The Editorial Board

Monday night’s U.S. raid to arrest Canadian leader Mark Carney is the culmination of President Donald Trump’s ambitious policy to bring peace, prosperity and freedom to North America.

From a purely legal perspective, the justification for capturing Carney is as sound as January’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. The objective of both operations was to arrest, rather than kill, people suspected of a crime, who are now receiving due process in the U.S. court system.

The Trump administration has carefully framed the Ottawa raid as a domestic U.S. law enforcement operation rather than a military attack, unveiling a new criminal indictment of Carney after he was seized. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff emphasized that federal agents were on the ground in Ottawa as well as soldiers, and he referred to Carney and his wife as “the indicted persons.” Vice-President JD Vance posted, “You don’t get to avoid justice for drug trafficking in the United States because you live in a mansion in Ottawa.” During a Tuesday arraignment in a federal court in New York, Carney and his wife pleaded not guilty.

Prosecutors have indicted many foreign leaders for U.S. criminal offences, including Panama leader Manuel Antonio Noriega in 1989 and Maduro in January. There is nothing novel about the arrest of Carney.

The case against Carney is strong. As Mr. Trump declared last year, the United States is experiencing a “public health crisis caused by fentanyl and illicit drugs flowing across the northern border into the United States” and Canada had failed to do anything about it. In fact, tens of thousands of Americans die each year from fentanyl-related overdoses, and Mr. Trump has said the amount of fentanyl seized at the northern border was enough to kill 9.5 million Americans.

Despite this, Carney’s government has downplayed the crisis, and his federal police force has denied there is a crisis at all. “There is limited to no evidence or data from law enforcement agencies in the U.S. or Canada to support the claim that Canadian-produced fentanyl is an increasing threat to the U.S.,” said Royal Canadian Mounted Police spokeswoman Marie-Eve Breton defiantly.

Carney’s government has proved itself either incapable or unwilling to address this crisis. Mr. Trump first attempted to force Canada to respond responsibly by imposing high tariffs on the nation, but the Carney government proved intransigent. So Carney’s arrest was needed for the protection of innocent Americans.

But as the court process plays out for Carney, let’s not lose sight of the broader geopolitical benefits of bringing Canada into the American governance system.

The United States was born of a war against European imperialism, yet despite victory in the War for Independence, European empires maintained a hold over most of North America. But with Mr. Trump’s bold capture of Nuuk in May, Greenland has been freed from Danish imperialism. Now, with the arrest of Carney, the continent can be freed of the last vestiges of British imperialism.

There is a long history of the Canadian Supreme Court, a holdover from the medieval monarchial courts of England, interfering with elections and local governments, most recently with its decision to void the results of the independence referendum in Alberta. The court ruled that the referendum was invalid because of the advertising purchased by oil companies, a clear attack on the rights to free speech that free people everywhere hold dear.

However, the referendum wasn’t really about creating an independent nation of Alberta; rather, it underscored the failure of the Canadian government, the moribund child of empire, to hold together as a cohesive polity that could serve the everyday needs of people across the vast and varied northern stretches of the continent. Despite its enormous mineral and oil wealth, Canada has failed to perform economically, and its people are the poorer for it.

And here is the opportunity. As with the once-independent countries of Texas and California before it, Canada rightly should become a state under the flag of the United States. With the help of Washington, a post-Carney Canada could finally see free and fair elections and the establishment of a secure and prosperous economy integrated with the rest of North America.

Let freedom ring. [Tyee]

READ MORE: Politics