Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

pensions: worse treatment than a lumpen who has never contributed




 

Hi Chris,

Is there any transparency in this part of our Government to protect us from arbitrary treatment? Can you require them to reveal to you the method and criteria of how they calculate how much each one of us gets?

Good luck!

John



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Hi John,
Thanks for raising this issue. Our federal government seems to be operating
on a divide-and-conquer basis with our old age pensions. I've been asking friends
like yourself, who are already receiving OAS about what they receive, and
everyone seems to be getting different amounts.

I know of one Marmora area lumpen (lifetime unemployed, never worked so received no CPP, etc.) who was receiving $1,350 a month, about $16,200 a year.

After 40 years of working, volunteering in my local communities and in the
national literary community, and after finally chasing down a Services Canada
person I learned I'm going to receive UNDER  $1K a month total government
support. According to the person this is because I cashed too many RSPs last
year ($15K - wow!). Also I received just under $400 a month CPP - because
I WORKED - and somehow the fact that I've been self-sufficient counts against
me in the calculations of Services Canada re OAS.

It's sad and pitiful that seniors who have contributed for a lifetime to
Canada are expected to live on what we're told will be around $16.5K
a year - but when we don't even receive that impoverished amount, well
- IT JUST AN'T RIGHT!

I won't receive the letter telling me of this decision for another month
(I applied for GAINS on May 1), so I can't begin the appeal process until
then. But there are huge broader issues here than just one small town poet
getting f*cked over. From what I'm learning the pension issue is systemic -
basically EVERYONE is getting f*cked over if we're only entitled to $16 -17
a year, and some of use are getting even more f*cked over than others. 

A sadder thought - above I compared my pension to that of a lumpen - but
compared to Senator Pamela Wallin's WEEKLY expense account, my $12K
a year is chump change. Now that's a comparison!

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

OLD AGE INSECURITY - dogfood time





As Canadians we mistakenly believe we have a social contract.

The majority of us work hard until we retire, and during these
years we pay many tens of thousands of dollars in income taxes,
as well as property taxes,  provincial taxes every time we buy
something apart from basic foodstuffs, and land transfer taxes

when we buy a house.

Like most Canadians I expected a decent, livable pension from

OLD AGE SECURITY  when I retired. I've always believed
(~FANTASY~) that the basic Canadian pension is around $16,500
a year - well below any area's poverty line - almost enough to eke
out a living.

HEADS UP!

The max Old Age Pension is just $546.07 a month!  yup, that's it ...

I've worked almost all of my 40 years in Canada, so I also collect the
princely sum of just under $400 a month from the CANADA

PENSION PLAN (CPP). A tiny pension from Toronto Public
Library adds a few dollars more.
TURNS OUT I'LL BE EXPECTED TO LIVE ON $1,000 A MONTH

FOR THE NEXT YEAR.

THIS IS ABOUT $4,500 LESS THAN A LUMPEN WHO HAS

 NEVER WORKED A DAY IN THEIR LIFE RECEIVES!!!!
Here's the explanatory letter I submitted for the GAINS supplement.

After anxiously waiting over a month and a half for SERVICE
CANADA to send me a response, I called them this afternoon &
learned I'm entitled to $11.28 for my monthly GAINS supplement.

Here's my letter to SERVICES CANADA:


Further information and Clarification for GAINS Application - Christopher F. Faiers


I was wrongfully dismissed from my job as a village head

librarian in October 2006 at age 58. I received payments from
my former employer for 8 months, and then I received 8 months
of Employment Insurance while I continued unsuccessfully
to search for work.

I began receiving CPP payments of just under $400 a month

when I turned 60. My 2012 CPP income was $4,620.00.

I also receive a tiny pension of under $1K a year from OMERS from

employment with Toronto Public Library.
My OMERS income for 2012 was $832.44. This may be somewhat

reduced once I begin receiving OAS.

My 2012 combined income from these two pensions, which are my

only substantial income sources, was $5,452.44.


Lived off Cashing RRSPs
For the past several years my primary source of income has been

cashing my limited savings within RRSPs.
I have just about exhausted all the funds within my RRSP, and I

will no longer be able to depend on withdrawing from RRSP savings
as a substantial source of income.


Self-Employment as a Poet (Writer)
Several years ago I hired an accountant to file my income taxes. The

accountant said that I should file as a self-employed poet (writer), as
I receive small annual payments for my books of poetry which are in
public libraries.  
In 2012 I received $408.11 from Access Canada and $373.44 from Public

Lending Rights, PLR, (Canada Council) for a total 2012 writer's income
of $781.55. 

My accountant claimed 2012 expenses for my writing income which

were higher than my writer's income, which resulted in a net 
self-employment income loss of $4,568.76 in 2012.

                                         . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


I trust that this additional information will help clarify my very

limited income situation, and the quite desperate requirement that
I qualify for a GAINS supplement.

I am most willing to cooperate in any way should you require further

information or verification concerning my income situation and
qualification for GAINS support.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration.

Christopher F. Faiers
(signed)

Saturday, 15 June 2013

"The Problem with Poetry" from Andreas Gripp's blog


Friday, 14 June 2013


The Problem with Poetry




In honour of the $65,000 prizes doled out at last night's Griffin Awards ("for Excellence in Poetry"), where "guests at the Thursday gala feasted on shrimp tacos, truffled wild mushrooms and beef tenderloin," I'd thought I'd re-post an unflattering critique of the "scene" that's become the foundation for contemporary CanLit verse ...

Being both a writer and reader, having been a publisher and having worked for decades in the retail end of the book trade, I’ve been exposed to all sides of the publishing industry. And yes, it’s an industry. And yes, even poetry has become an industry and has been for some time.

This doesn’t mean that its goal is to make boatloads of money. Poetry certainly does not: for the author, the publisher or the bookseller. But it’s an industry in that it’s controlled by an elite circle that holds a disproportionate amount of power and influence in how poetry is presented to the public and in how it’s sustained. Having been out-of-touch with the general populace for decades, poetry in Canada subsists through government arts funding – via the Canada Council, as well as a provincial body for administering money to book publishers (the Ontario Arts Council in the case of my own province), and, in the method applicable to literary magazines, through entry fees charged to poets who wish to enter the myriad of prestigious contests that the established periodicals constantly offer.

And here lies the long-standing issue I’ve had with the “poetry scene” in Canada: its emphasis on competition and its obsession with contests and awards – and the ego that comes along with them. Read any bio of a poet on tour, making a stop in your town, or the back jacket of their latest book, and it’s little more than a list of finalist and first-place finishes. The poet has won this award, and that one, made the shortlist for this prize, and that one. There’s scant mention, if any, about the actual poetry the author does – and that’s because the poetry itself has become secondary in importance. It doesn’t matter if the verses are ones that will resonate with readers, or listeners, or is even any good. What counts is that Poet X has been published in 57 literary magazines and has been nominated for 26 awards, winning a half-dozen times, providing the material needed for which to brag about over some pompous gala’s fondue. And of course, it doesn’t matter if Poet X even reads the periodicals he or she is published in – they’re merely stepping stones to achieving the publication of another volume of verse that’s entirely his or her own. 

So who reads these esteemed literary journals (in which being published is a requirement for having a book of poems released by what the CanLit clique deems a “recognized press”)? The general public? Hardly. Most of the readership are the poets and the aspirants who are manipulated into signing up for a subscription via the aforementioned “contest fees.” Let’s face it, how else will these pretentious quarterlies obtain any hint of a readership? By making the purchasing of a year’s worth of issues a requirement for a writer to submit poems to a publication’s annual or semi-annual contest. And without a list of awards and honorable mentions to back up a poet’s curriculum vitae, then CanLit isn’t interested in publishing a person’s manuscript.

The defenders of the CanLit system will argue thus: “but without that recognition, without achieving national awards and publication in peer-reviewed journals, then most publishers in Canada will be unable to sell a poet’s book.” And why is that? Could it be because the poetry is irrelevant to the average reader, that it simply mimics the style that’s been embraced as the standard by an elite, academic, often Toronto-centric circle of adjudicators? That much of it is obscure, cut-up prose, has little semblance to the cadence and emotion of the past, when people bought up poetry books because the words and stanzas meant something to them?

Today, the books and authors that CanLit will espouse as “the voice of Canadian poetry” occupy little hovels in bookshop corners, being outsold by almost every literary genre imaginable. But that’s okay, because our publishers don’t need Jane and John Public to buy their books – they get most of their money courtesy of arts grants and contest fees. Literary publishers themselves freely admit that if it weren’t for the grants, they could not survive. They could not survive because people aren’t interested in reading the books they publish, and people aren’t interested in reading them because the poetry presented, for the most part, is indistinguishable from most of the other poetry books on the shelf, few of which are presented for the reader’s benefit, filled with poems that follow a tired formula of endless opacity, concluding with a “killer” line desperately yearning to sound more profound than it could ever hope to be.

I’ve come to the conclusion that the majority of published poets (and by published, I refer to the guidelines set forth by the Canada Council, the Ontario Arts Council, and institutions such as the League of Canadian Poets) clearly appear to write their poems in order to impress:  editors, publishers, and contest/grant adjudicators. Without this triad, without these “keepers of the keys to the Kingdom,” poets cannot be published – really published, that is, as opposed to the independents or self-publishers whom they ignore, bar from their tier-driven organizations, and even downright disdain (and yes, there are, admittedly, heaps of equally narcissistic self-published poets worthy of such).  It’s here where the biggest problem with poetry today rests: this establishment of wine-and-cheese editors and the faithful, prolifically published disciples of versifiers ever-eager for that next photo-op available at the Toronto soiree of their choice.

I’m not necessarily saying that poets should never enter contests. Or hope to win awards. I’ve entered a few of both, when there isn’t some $35 fee that pretty well forces me to subscribe to a magazine I really don’t want to read. There are a few contests that are free (and of course, poets need to be aware that even some of the free ones, that promise publication in some hard-copy monstrosity, are exploitive in that if you want to see your work in print, then be prepared to shell out $75 or so to see it); and there are those with a very nominal monetary requirement that may be all well and good and whose administrators are not out to prey on poets. But overall, the Canadian landscape (and the American one, and the British one, etc.) is filled with calls to enter, dangling that carrot of success and achievement before the noses of the naive. “Who Says Rhyme Doesn’t Pay?” boomed the full-page ad in a national poetry journal, calling for contestants for its annual “Poem of the Year” award. I’ll say it doesn’t pay. Simply because this magazine won’t publish rhyming poems or any of the “doggerel” that its editors hope will pour in from seniors who write stanzas for church bulletins, along with the thirty or so dollars per entry sent by those with delusions of a first-place finish, fleeting recognition and a decent dollar prize (editors who are always prepared to exploit those they normally reject come contest time – when they need a hefty infusion of funds). Granted, the issues of this periodical, when they arrive over the next twelve months, will no doubt find a place on a person’s bookshelf, after he or she has quickly leafed through it, reluctantly admitting that the photographs inside are far better than the poems therein, much like those brightly coloured books you had as a child that wooed you with their pictures but at least had a text that in some meaningful way, spoke to you where you were, at that moment, and that today you can still recall.


-- Andreas Gripp


6 comments:

  1. Like music to my ears, my friend...
    Reply

    Replies









    1. You understand the situation so very well, Conrad. Cheers.
  2. I agree with pretty much all of what you say, Andreas (and do remember reading it when first posted), but will add that as long as there are awards like last night's Griffin, I'm glad when long-ignored poets like David W. McFadden finally get a nod from the "establishment". And Ghassan Zaqtan, the Palestinian poet who was first denied a visa to get into Canada, partly on the basis of not having proved he had enough $$ to come in, and his translator, Fady Joudah, won as well. I guess he has enough now, eh?
    Reply

    Replies









    1. Hi Linda,

      I'm not sure how David can be considered "long-ignored" when he's been shortlisted before, gets national reviews and praise for his work, and has his poems and books published by the key CanLit presses.

      As for Ghassan, I heard several of his poems read during the Griffin's livestream of the shortlist readings and was very underwhelmed. Worth 65 grand? Don't think so. But the politcal angle makes it appealing to the event for sure.
  3. Tops popped on many cans of worms:

    Thanks for this thought-provoking piece, Andreas. You've popped the top off several
    dozen cans of worms for me regarding the
    state of the calling of poet in Canada.

    So many tops popped I'm going to ramble/rumble
    with a few, then head off for today's adventures, hopefully to return later with more
    rumblings.

    Just learned from Linda Crosfield's comment that David McFadden won, which is good news!!! Other poets who are generally considered outsiders, & who should get the bucks, but not the slightly arrogant & pretentious aroma that comes with most awards, are bill bissett, David Day, Jim Christy, James Deahl,& Katherine L. Gordon.

    Hmmm ... seems the poets I admire most are almost all poor & outside the halls of academe,
    & all of them have a foundation in politikal activism which they demonstrate in their poetry.

    On awards:
    It's a truism for me that the more awards, the smaller the talent - this is so egregious in
    haiku that I esp.seek to keep my distance from
    fellow haijin : )

    But ... awards, academic degrees & one-upsmanship, all that stuff IS a part of CanPo, & always will be. I did a piece on my blog on the co-dependence between 'real' poets
    and the academy a while back.

    I'm running out of steam already - it's a beaut. day for a change, & I've got outside projects to do.

    With your permission, I'd like to cross-post your piece on my blog & continue the discussion there.

    many cans, many fats worms a-crawling around
    peace & poetry power!
    Chris (Faiers)


    Outsiders & damn good poets all.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Chris

    Sure, you can share this on your blog. As I mentioned to Linda, I'd hardly describe David as an "outsider" -- I haven't read his latest so I can't give my view on his work. I agree with you about James and Katherine, though I don't care for bissett and his "one trick pony" method of writing -- totally overrated in my opinion. Not familiar with the others.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Thanks, Andreas, for letting me repost your stimulating
    piece. There are so many topics opened up here it's hard
    to know which ones to pursue first.

    One of the concerns your rant raises for me is how little

    most Canpoets know about each other, or even that there
    is such a wide range & variety of so many very accomplished
    CanPoets writing & creating - a whole sidebar issue.

    Many of those I consider the best aren't members of The

    League of CanPo, so in the past there hasn't been a
    convenient way to learn about each other. Now with the web
    & blogs we can begin to connect & interact, & overcome
    the current dominant power structure of universities & staid
    closed shop elites.

    Also I'd love to have an extensive book on all of us published

    - THE LIVES OF THE CANADIAN POETS (yeah, the title's
    an Untermeyer crib). And the person who could best do this is
    James Deahl. I believe it was Faith Popcorn, or one of those
    yankee media mavens, who said 'poetry isn't interesting,
    but poets are'. So true in CanPo that the poets are verrrry
    interesting - but ALSO the poetry in many cases.

    more later ...

    Off to ZenRiver Gardens to enjoy the endless round of mowing

    & beerzen on the shaman shack deck.

    peace & poetry power!
    Chris ... & Chase Wrfffffffffffffffff! (yeah, let's get outta here - NOW!)
     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    On 2013-06-15, at 12:29 PM, Conrad DiDiodato wrote:

    A very timely discussion, and yes, Chris, the Net will be the great equalizer. We each of us have to form a centre of poetic activity (wherever we happen to reside) and using, online resources, form a formidable opposition to the 'wine-and-cheese' crowd that's got a stranglehold on real poets/poetry...

    Conrad

                           .........................................................

    Thanks for your further input, Conrad. You were one of the first
    CanPoets to realize the democratizing power of the net, & I've
    been following your lead on this on Riffs & Ripps.

    I also agree with your suggestion for each of us to form a centre
    of poetic activity  - reminds me of the slogan THINK UNIVERSALLY,
    ACT LOCALLY. We both organize local People's Poetry events,
    & I believe this combo, along with all the old-fashioned activities
    of chapbook/book publishing, public readings etc. will further unify
    the 'larger than we realize' scope of Canadian poetry.
    p&p!
    C&C Wrfffffffffff!

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



    On 2013-06-15, at 1:05 PM, marvin orbach wrote:


    Hi Chris,
        That was a great piece by Andreas Gripp.   I read it twice.  He has a lot of important things to say.  It should be read by as many people as possible. I will see to it that it will be preserved   at the Univ. of Calgary in Special Collections.  I have a  warm spot in my heart for Andreas Gripp.  He is a poet as well as a book dealer.  That is a magic combination.
          I hope your Mom is doing better.  We send her our best wishes for happiness.
         In Frieden und mit der ganzen Kraft der Poesie.
         Marvin.

                           ..............................................

    Thanks, Marvin!
    I'll copy this to Andreas - there is so little praise on the CanPo scene that I always try to pass it on when it
    happens  :  )

    Yes, it's a very important piece. And perhaps Conrad was one of the first CanPoets to intuit how important the web was
    going to be in democratizing CanPo - Andreas & I are following his lead with our blogs. Now we can all have our say,
    almost immediately, without the filtering & approval of the cliquey 'powers that be'. 

    peace & poetry power!
    Chris ... & a sleepy Chase wffffffffffffffff! (just back from aft at ZRG)

    p.s. Andreas, have you donated any stuff to Marvin's amazing CanPo collection at UofCalgary special collections archives?

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     "He is a poet as well as a book dealer.  That is a magic combination."

    What a lovely tribute to Andreas...and I couldn't agree more.

    Conrad
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

Yankee whistleblower Snowden supported by Hong Kong Rally


XAyxq4J.jpg (843×308)
Support Edward Snowden HK香港聲援愛德華.斯諾登
Event
"My intention is to ask the courts and people of Hong Kong to decide my fate.
I have been given no reason to doubt your system."
- Edward Snowden
Meet 3pm, Chater Garden, Central Exit J2 | 本周六下午3點中環地鐵 J2出口
March to the US consulate, then HK SAR HQ in Tamar.
place
Confirmed Speakers:
Albert Ho, Chairman of HK Alliance & ex-Democratic Party leader: "Why this case is important for HK's future"
Law Yuk Kai, Director, HK Human Rights Monitor: “Hong Kong’s legal system & international legal system"
Ip lam Chong, In-Media HK: “The implications of Edward Snowden coming to Hong Kong”
Claudia Mo, LegCo member, founding member of Civic Party: “Whistleblowers and free speech in HK”
Charles Mok, LegCo: “The right to communicate safely online and freedom of expression”
divider-png.png (200×38)
logo
Info at InMedia.org (Chi) & HongWrong.com (Eng)
JBtqptL.jpg (641×425)
divider-png.png (200×38)
Download signs/placards (or make your own):
Utw4he8.jpg (639×86)
Download event flyer (Eng/Chi):
O3k3YC6.png (74×95)
Link to event & update your timeline pic on FB:
timeline
divider-png.png (200×38)
Download press release / media contacts (Eng/Chi):
O3k3YC6.png (74×95)
  • Edward Snowden, the whistleblower behind the NSA internet and phone surveillance program has come to Hong Kong because, he says, we “have a spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent". Snowden sacrificed his personal safety and freedom to defend our right to free speech and Internet freedom.

  • We call on Hong Kong to respect international legal standards and procedures relating to the protection of Snowden; we condemn the U.S. government for violating our rights and privacy; and we call on the U.S. not to prosecute Snowden.”

  • Do you want to stand for freedom and the rule of law? Or should we totally disregard Hong Kong's legal system? This episode marks a crossroads in Hong Kong's future. Stand up for the future of Hong Kong.

  • Time: 3-5:30pm, Saturday June 15, 2013. Please bring a whistle!

  • Rally route: Starting 3pm at Chater Garden, Central MTR exit J2. Rally to the U.S Consulate and then Tamar SAR government building.

  • Rally preparation: Please bring your friends, prepare for rain and try to bring water resistant posters. Slogan suggestions: "Defend Free Speech, Protect Snowden", "No Extradition", "Respect Hong Kong Law", "Shame on NSA", "Stop Internet Surveillance", "Betray Snowden = Betray Freedom".
divider-png.png (200×38)
  • 揭發美國國家安全局侵犯全球互聯網和電話用戶私隱的愛德華.斯諾登目前正藏身香港,
    因為他相信香港「很重視言論自由和表達政治異見的權利」。他犧牲了自己的安逸的生活和自由,
    去捍衞大家的網絡與言論自由,這場仗不應該由他一個人來背負。

  • 請大家站出來,要求香港政府根據本身的法律去處理和保護斯諾登;譴責美國侵犯我們的權利與私隱,
    要求美國政府不要壓害這位人權捍衞者。

  • 我們亦要借這機會,告訴世界,香港市民會站出來,捍衞自由、人權和法治等普世價值。
    發出我們的聲音,向壓迫者說不!

  • 遊行時間:2013年6月15日下午3點至5點半。 請帶上口哨,我們都是 whistleblowers.

  • 遊行路線:3點於遮打花園(中環站J2出口)起步遊行至美國領事館抗議,
    再遊行至添馬艦政府總部要求港府保護斯諾登。

  • 遊行準備:請呼朋引伴一齊來;由於當天可能下雨,請自備一些防水的海報和橫額。遊行的口號包括:
    「捍衞自由港 保護斯諾登」、「停止互聯網監控」、「NSA可恥」、「出賣斯諾登=出賣自由」
divider-png.png (200×38)

Tuesday, 11 June 2013

Milt's home for years, SILVER DOLLAR/WAVERLEY HOTEL may be torn down



Hotel Waverly, Silver Dollar may be torn down for student residence

The Silver Dollar Club and 113-year-old hotel may be replaced by 20-storey tower with a resurrected blues club on the ground floor.

 
James Earl Ray is said to have stayed at the Hotel Waverly and spent time drinking at the Silver Dollar while on the run after assassinating Martin Luther King in 1968. Bob Dylan, Levon Helm played impromptu shows at the blues bar. The hotel and blues club could become a thing of the past if approval is given to build a 20-storey student housing unit on the site.

Carlos Osorio / Toronto Star

James Earl Ray is said to have stayed at the Hotel Waverly and spent time drinking at the Silver Dollar while on the run after assassinating Martin Luther King in 1968. Bob Dylan, Levon Helm played impromptu shows at the blues bar. The hotel and blues club could become a thing of the past if approval is given to build a 20-storey student housing unit on the site.



The Silver Dollar Club was a place anyone could go to blend in with the crowd and take in some of the world’s best “never-heard-of” blues acts.
Or, in the case of James Earl Ray: to hide from the law.
Ray, the man who assassinated Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, is said to have spent his days on the run drinking at the bar while holed up at the Hotel Waverly, on Spadina Ave. near College St.

The People’s Poet, Milton Acorn, lived in the hotel in the 1970s, penning some of his most acclaimed work.

Bob Dylan and Levon Helm both graced the stage unannounced in the club’s 55-year storied history — Canadian icons The Barenaked Ladies and Blue Rodeo, too.
Photos View gallery
  • Bob Dylan, seen playing Toronto's Maple Leaf Gardens in 1981, once played a surprise show at the Silver Dollar Room, whose future is now uncertain. zoom
Even when it was a strip club for a brief period in the 1970s, dancers there performed to a live blues band.

The 113-year-old hotel and bar property, however, has seen better days. If they get approval, its owners plan to tear down the low-rent residential hotel and build a 20-storey student housing complex, with the Silver Dollar reopening on the first floor.

“You can’t re-create flavour, but you can try,” said building owner Paul Wynn. “It won’t be the same, but we’re hoping it’ll be better.”

Having spent time working for a film company in the 1980s and travelling in Europe, staying in hostels, he dreamt of a similar life for the hotel when he purchased it upon returning to Canada.
It never worked out.

“People weren’t backpacking through Canada the same way they were in Europe,” he said.
A wooden structure that was built “piecemeal,” said Wynn, the hotel building is “rotted out.”
Renovation wouldn’t be economical, added Wynn, now owner of The Wynn Group. “It’s always been added on, before there was any building code,” he said.

“I’ve lived with it for 20 years, trying to figure out what to do with it. We’re taking a very logical approach to it.”

A building that would offer 200-plus units for students — to help with the growing need for rental units for students at the nearby University of Toronto campus — made the most sense.
When his daughter needed an affordable place to live near the university, Wynn said it was impossible to find — not even in his own rental units could he find a four-bedroom apartment for her and three roommates.

But losing the hotel will leave others in the lurch, said manager Kuma Nava, who has run it for 22 years. While some of the tenants are temporary, a half-dozen seniors have lived there for more than 15 years — some even longer.

“They’re very angry,” he said. “They don’t want to lose their home.”
The low- to mid-rise neighbourhood has come under increasing development pressure in recent years.

Last year, the city turned down a proposed 24-storey student residence just east on College St., after neighbourhood organizations mounted a vocal opposition. Residents compared plans for the privately run residence, which would include 759 bedrooms but no kitchens, to a massive rooming house.

But the city said such a building couldn’t be considered a rooming house — a designation limited to 25 units — and there is no bylaw to regulate a building of that type and size. Residents also argued the scale was out of keeping with the low-rise nature of the neighbourhood.

The developer, Knightstone Capital Management, appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, which is scheduled to hear the case next month. In the meantime, Knightsbridge acquired an adjacent property on College St. and added another storey, and 100 more units, to the original application.

The city is considering another proposal to build a 19-storey highrise just a few doors east on College.

Wynn said his plan is to have units that include a common living room and kitchen area with four bedrooms, each with their own private bathroom.

Nava said residents, including himself, don’t want large buildings in the area, especially with a school nearby that could be overshadowed by the structure.
“They’ve tried before and I don’t think they get what they want,” he added.

With files from Patty Winsa

20100728PP05.jpg 

                              ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

thanks for this news story Chris.
perhaps it's time to have Milt's plaque taken care of before it's lost.
those developers don't give a damn about it's past history.
there goes another great memory of our Toronto arts scene.
So sad !  I remember some great nights at the old Silver Dollar.

best regards,
Peter Rowe





                                ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
 

Hi Peter,
Yes, it's sad to think of no more Silver Dollar  :  (  I stopped in there for

a pee on the way to Allan Briesmaster's reading at Q Space a couple of
months ago. Also we held the second presentation of Milt's Award there
- circa 1988? I arranged for Robert Priest & his reunited bank to play
that nite - then Robert ended up receiving his own Acorn Award a few
years later.

And we used to go to the SD for drinks during CLM because our national

office was right on the corner of College & Spadina.
I've left many a brain cell in the Silver Dollar Room!!!
peace & poetry power!
Chris & Chase Wrfffffffffffffffffffff!

                             ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~



 

Monday, 10 June 2013


10th anniversary of same-sex marriage in Canada


"We peer so suspiciously at each other that we cannot see that we Canadians are standing on the mountaintop of human wealth, freedom and privilege" (Pierre Elliott Trudeau)
___________

It's nice to live in what's probably the most tolerant, respectful and decent nation on earth. I'm proud to be Canadian today because, while most democracies are still debating same-sex marriage and in many parts of the world to be gay is almost a death sentence, in Canada's it's been a working living reality for ten years.


Thursday, 6 June 2013

orange bellyflash!



Chase & I visited ZenRiver Gardens this aft, & I was able to mow
most of the campsites before the drizzle began. The bad news is it's
forecast to rain here all weekend & into next week. Arrgggghh
Good for all the green things, but a bit repetitious for humans (& Chase).

As soon as I finished today's mowing it began to lightly drizzle. I wandered
along the shore, checking the new plantings of blue spruce. I paused by the
dragon rock, when this crazy feeding frenzy froze my meanderings & gave
me pleasure for 10 minutes of wonderment:
 
orange bellyflash!
bridge sparrow aerobatics
over zenriver









Visited ZenRiver again today, Sunday, June 9. Chase & I had just walked
thru the cedar twig entrance gate when ...

ZenRiver retreat
greets us with
fresh wolf poop!